2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1955 Packard Patrician
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1955 Packard Patrician. (271 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Packard Patrician.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Packard Patrician. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1955 Packard Patrician | |
Make | Mazda | Packard |
Model | CX-9 | Patrician |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 5767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3240 mm |