2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1955 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1955 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
Make | Mazda | Singer |
Model | CX-9 | Hunter |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2180 mm |