2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600.
Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1957 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | CX-9 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 269 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2010 mm |
