2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 604 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | CX-9 | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |