2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1958 Simca Vedette
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1958 Simca Vedette.
Because 1958 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1958 Simca Vedette | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | CX-9 | Vedette |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
