2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1961 NSU Prinz IV

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 NSU Prinz IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 NSU Prinz IV would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. (30 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 764 kg more than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 NSU Prinz IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 NSU Prinz IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. (44 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1961 NSU Prinz IV has manual transmission. 1961 NSU Prinz IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda CX-9 1961 NSU Prinz IV
Make Mazda NSU
Model CX-9 Prinz IV
Year Released 2009 1961
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3726 cc 598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 273 HP 30 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 44 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 7.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1329 kg 565 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 3570 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 37 L