2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CX-9 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 38 L |
