2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 629 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CX-9 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3724 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |
