2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1965 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CX-9 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3727 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |
