2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | CX-9 | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |