2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1969 Seat 124
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 124 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1969 Seat 124. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 124.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 124. (90 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 124.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1969 Seat 124 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | CX-9 | 124 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2430 mm |