2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1970 Triumph GT6
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph GT6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph GT6 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1970 Triumph GT6. (104 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph GT6.
Because 1970 Triumph GT6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Triumph GT6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph GT6. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph GT6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1970 Triumph GT6 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | CX-9 | GT6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2120 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 63 L |