2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1971 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1971 Holden Monaro. (238 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Monaro.
Because 1971 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Monaro (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1971 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1971 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Monaro |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 5040 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2830 mm |