2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (123 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 121 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-9 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |