2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | CX-9 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3724 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2260 mm |
