2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 309 kg more than 1980 TVR 3000.
Because 1980 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1980 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1980 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | CX-9 | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 58 L |