2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | CX-9 | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2550 mm |