2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1981 Renault 9. (54 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 276 kg more than 1981 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | CX-9 | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 22.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 38 L |