2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Simca 1100
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1981 Simca 1100. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Simca 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Simca 1100. (66 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Simca 1100 | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | CX-9 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3727 cc | 942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 269 Nm | 66 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 42 L |
