2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 509 kg more than 1981 Toyota Tercel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1981 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1981 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Tercel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2510 mm |