2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1982 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1982 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Gemini |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2410 mm |