2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | CX-9 | 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 58 L |
