2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1983 Mini MK V

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1983 Mini MK V has manual transmission. 1983 Mini MK V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: