2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 509 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1983 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CX-9 | 9 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 38 L |
