2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |