2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1984 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Astra would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 474 kg more than 1984 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1984 Holden Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Astra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2420 mm |