2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1985 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1985 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1985 Holden Gemini.
Because 1985 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1985 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Gemini |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2410 mm |