2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1986 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | CX-9 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3724 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |
