2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |