2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |