2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Nova would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1996 Holden Nova | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Nova |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2470 mm |