2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 501 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CX-9 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2730 mm |