2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1996 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 101 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1996 Nissan Cefiro | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | Cefiro |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3725 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
