2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1996 Volvo 460
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 460. (82 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 460.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 460. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1996 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-9 | 460 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |