2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo 850 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo 850 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-9 | 850 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2670 mm |