2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1998 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1998 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 1998 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1998 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
| Model | CX-9 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2330 mm |
