2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 86 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3724 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |
