2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2000 TVR Tamora
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 TVR Tamora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 TVR Tamora would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Tamora (334 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Tamora should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 99 kg more than 2000 TVR Tamora.
Because 2000 TVR Tamora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 TVR Tamora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Tamora (514 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 2000 TVR Tamora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2000 TVR Tamora | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | CX-9 | Tamora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 334 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 514 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1230 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 57 L |