2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner (270 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm). This means 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2002 Mitsubishi Space Liner | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CX-9 | Space Liner |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 90 L |