2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Windstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | CX-9 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3725 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3066 mm |
