2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 159 kg more than 2004 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
