2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | CX-9 | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |