2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | CX-9 | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 269 Nm | 252 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |