2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (270 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 794 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-9 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 82 L |