2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 44 kg more than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda CX-9 2005 Nissan X-Trail
Make Mazda Nissan
Model CX-9 X-Trail
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3726 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 273 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1329 kg 1285 kg
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 60 L