2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2006 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2006 Renault Scenic. (161 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Scenic (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2006 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | CX-9 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |