2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2007 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 273 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2007 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Sequoia (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2007 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 4798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |