2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | CX-9 | TT |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |