2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | CX-9 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2845 mm |