2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Mazda | Aston Martin |
| Model | CX-9 | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
